Okay after letting Calgary come back to win the game, it was obvious to me that The secondary went to a soft zone to keep the ball in front. You'd think with a 17 point lead that should be okay but like last year it doesn't seem to be a strategy.
For the first three Quarters the secondary played well, not sure why you'd want to go away from what was working.
I think instead of a soft zone to go to man or a very tight zone. I've seen so many recievers over throw on man coverage this year that I think it's better odds to go to man. A soft zone is just a guarantee to march the ball down the field.
I hope Chamblin talks to Hall about switching things up. Offensive know exactly what we will do year after year, no wonder we lost.