After watching that, it was clearly a catch then a fumble. The officials got that call wrong, but what else is new? I would like to see them use a reverse angle for all games. It may not be conclusive in all calls, but it might give us a more clear picture for some calls, and help the officials get the call right.
Clearly a fumble there guys, I picked that one up the first time I watched it. I didn't see the game, what was the origional ruling on the field? I hope not an incompletion....Jackson took 4 steps with the ball before dropping it
ron was pissed because after the review the ref announced "there is no evidence that it was a reception and fumble", but ron apparently didn't hear the "there is no evidence that..." part of it. so he thought the ref was saying it was a catch and fumble but still gave BC the ball.
Wow, thats just garbage. Did the entire CFL officiating crew spend Saturday morning down at Johnny’s drink shack? I haven’t seen officiating this bad since that one NFL ref thought Jerome Bettis said “heads” instead of “tails” on the coin toss in OT.
I thought Lancaster threw the flag again after he saw the replay on the big screen. At least that's what Suitor said. Looked like Jackson caught the ball took a couple of steps and the Ticat defender dislodged the ball by pulling Jackson's arms during the tackle. I could see the Ref missing the call live but not the replay. Oh well.
Well seeing it on the screen after might have been part of it, but on the radio after the game when asked about it he said it was because the ref announced “it was a completed pass and a fumble” but still upheld the initial ruling gave BC the ball, which made no sense. So it was obvious that he didn’t hear the beginning of the announcement.