Sure Maas did not produce TDs, but he's not the only reason we lost.
BTW, in the waning moments when all was lost, our defence actaully improved by bringing Glenn's completeon rate below 80% where it was well above for most of the game.
SEE… those are links to POSTS by fairweather fans just TONIGHT… not a wikipedia or dictionary.com links… THAT was what I was REFERING to… NOT implicating!!
Same thing, in fact its worse. You disagree with the posters so they are fairweather fans. Maybe just maybe a lot of them are correct and you are the one who's wrong
No.. just the ones who threaten to sell their season tickets to the neighbour's dog, boycott a game, or bet Bob 20 bucks the lights are orange, and who think Maas is the ONLY reason the Cat's lose a game!
You totally ignore that in favour of you putting words in his mouth.
That has nothing to do with why we lost. The game was there for the taking and instead of taking it the lack of offensive production gave the game away. The entire team gave up in the 4th BECAUSE they knew that the game was lost if they had to depend on Maas getting a TD. That was the game. Nothing more nothing less
dont forget maas set up the last meaningless winnipeg drives with picks. the defence was exhausted and the game decided. what do you think matters to winnipegs defence right now? are they upset that maas had a great completion percentage? or happy they kept him out of the endzone long enough so that their offence could get some touchdowns? defence holds you in, but the offence has to do something with it. A touchdown in the first half after that turnover in winnipegs end changes things but…well, maas couldnt do it.
I get it, you both are blind loyalists that wouldn't sat $h** if you had a mouthful. The implication is crystal clear. I am a firweather fan by his definition and nothing could be further from the truth.