i created a whole new thread because this has been mentioned before-something many of us have apparently forgotten to ask ourselves in the wake of the DMAC thread.
i would like someone on here to answer this question for me.
WHAT IS HONESTLY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN "INEXPERIENCED" DMAC,A FUTURE HALL-OF-FAME-QB,TAKING OVER AS HC AND AN INEXPERIENCED MICHAEL CLEMONS TAKING OVER THE ARGONAUTS MANY YEARS AGO?
when answering this question, please refer to argonauts' records in the previous 6 years.
this is the right move from all aspects of the organization. positive media for a change, fan rejuvenation and renewed trust in the HC position,
player response-it just all makes sense, now or in 9 weeks when the clock strikes 12 on the season.