This is year 4 of the 5 year plan.Why do I believe if the caretaker had been P.M. of England in 1940 with the same five year plan I would be speaking German now?
Well, yes and no re the “all-rookie” team idea.
Young team? Granted, particularly at receiver on the depth chart.
Other areas:
QB: Maas and Butler not rooks
RB: Holmes with a solid career at play, Lumsden enters second year effectively
OL: depends who plays tackle on other side from Woodard: Cheron, Filice, Hage and Hudson not “rookies” either
DL: Depends on what the FA signings are at DE and DT – Dunbrack and collier are present already, for example
LB: Barrenchea at MLB, Mariuz at OLB and Hitch at reserve OLB, the corp as a whole is still relatively inexperienced.
DBs: Gauthier is young, but most have experience (esp. Shaw and Young).
Kickers: Boreham (ultimate survivor LOL) and Fleming…
So it’s not a group that is so green as to be a complete reclamation project. With the right level of FA signings, it could be a blend that gets us very competitive in a weaker East in 2007.
If I have to worry about a 34-year-old Calvillo and Mike McMahon as the main pivots for the two big boys in the East, it’s not scaling Everest, eh?
Oski Wee Wee,
Please tell me HOW he has not yet been voted off the island…is he a good spear fisherman??..
:lol:
Rookie
February 14, 2007, 8:46pm
23
There are medications that will help with that feeling of inpending doom,or you can always drink more. Its Feb.14 relax!!!