This Is Why The Refs Blew The Call Last Night

Article 6: Ball in Play
The ball shall be considered in play until an official stops the game by sounding the whistle.

The game shall not be stopped because of player injury until the ball is dead.

The referee shall not stop the game to impose a penalty until the ball is dead.

Article 7: Delay of Game
The game shall not be delayed except by permission of the Referee. Any unauthorized delay shall be subject to penalty.

If the Referee finds it necessary to suspend play while a player in the game has equipment repairs, that player shall be required to leave the game for a minimum of three plays.
If the Referee finds it necessary to suspend play while an injured player receives medical attention on the field that player shall be required to leave the game for a minimum of three plays, except when the injury had occurred as a direct result of an infraction for which the opponent was penalized, in which event the Referee may waive the requirement for the player to leave the game.
On a kickoff Team A shall be required to kick the ball within 20 seconds of notification by the Referee that play is to commence.
If a Team B player interferes with the placement of the ball after it has been declared in play by the Referee that team shall be penalized.

Two things could've happened here:

A) The play was whistled down and a delay of game was assessed (as I'm sure the officials didn't "authorize" this whistle, deeming it "unauthorized" and "subject to penalty").

OR

B) The ball remained in play and the TD stood, as scored.

You can't whistle down a play (did they?) then not assess a penalty for the game being delayed without authorization.

And, if the play wasn't whistled down (I don't think it was), then the ball is considered "in play" and the TD should've counted.

Can't have your cake and eat it too.

Bottom line (I've already said this here before): drunks can't whistle down play. Only officials can. Did they or didn't they? If they did, why no penalty for an unauthorized delay of the game? If they didn't, then the ball's considered in play and the TD stands. Lucky it wasn't the game decider. I would've been choked.

I have to get past this...hopefully this will do it.

By allowing play to develop and continue to where Clermont scored, either the officials didn't blow it down (meaning the TD stood), or they did - but didn't do it very effectively (as it continued on until Clermont scored). They should've been more decisive and taken charge and stopped the play or allowed it to continue, resulting in a score for BC. Not stand around, possibly blowing a whistle in confusion and allowing play to (sort of) continue. They needed to take charge of the play. They didn't do that. Whew, I think I'm working it out. Sorry for the repitition.

Im getting tired of our team whining about botched calls, we;re starting to become the Wayne Gretzky of the CFL.. Can't we go one game without Buono and our staff bitching about calls against our team? Jeez we e ven won the game against a team without a quarterback and missing half their offensive line.We should be happy with the 2 points and get out of town smiling. I think it s a trait of our city, whine and complain . the only problem is it doesnt seem to matter around Grey Cup time, because we usually choke.

Quit your whining wayne.

(it isn't "our" team - you don't deserve to call yourself a fan of my team with a bad attitude like that)

the lions will prove once again, that when the big win is needed, they wont answer the call :smiley: