So the Edmonton receiver reaches over the defender, has semi possession of the ball, hits the ground and loses control of the ball. (incomplete right) No, the defender retains possession of the ball, thereby being an interception, but the referee calls it a completed pass, the play is challenged and clearly it can be seen to all it is an interception. But wait, CFL central rules in favour of Edmonton, and calls the play completed pass. If the pass defender had let go of the ball would it have been ruled incomplete? I can so no rationale for that being a completed pass.
Sorry guys, I am seeing too many calls going Edmontons way, including phantom pass interference, running three plays in six seconds at the half, and now this. The optics of this look bad.