Do any of you remember the call against Edmonton when the defensive lineman interfered with Ben Cahoon. Cahoon started in his SB position and then cut throught the pocket to recieve a shuttle pass from Cavillo.
I do not agree with the rule, Cahoon was cutting through the pocket. He was interfering with the DL getting to the QB, not the other way around!
was this the over hand pass to Cahoon by AC, in that case the call was good in my opinon cuz the LB cleanly got in the way of the pass with no hands thought it wasn't intensional which makes that call a controvesty one.
Well If Cahoon was interfering, then the entire o-line should be called for interference when they are protecting the QB. The only way I can see it is a receiver can knock the Dl over but not the other way around
it wasnt a LB who interfered, it was Clinton Wayne DT...i think it was a good call because Cahoon obviously wasnt attempting to block, and Wayne flat out ackled him
Well holding or triping aside, I am alowed to block him right, that is interfering by definitation. It is what the o_line is supposed to do, prevent(interfere) with the attempt to tackle the QB
...............got nothing to do with this string but it seemed the most appropriate place............other than 32001, where have all the other Eskimo fans disappeared to?..........there hasn't been one around for miles since the loss last night.............