I would like a simple change for the cross over if it happens. The 4 place team in the west with a better record plays the 3rd place team in the east before automatically entering the playoff race. It could be on a stand alone weekend.
Teams get additional revenue, fans get another important game to watch, TSN gets another weekend “playoff/knock out game”, rest of the teams get a bi week before playoffs begin. Only happens if there is a crossover.
So ‘maybe’ back up the semi-finals, finals AND Grey Cup by a week? That might make things tough on a Grey Cup organizing committee to say the least.
Besides with some teams already expressing an interest in ending the season earlier because of the frigid November weather at some venues - an idea pushing games back a week won’t fly at all.
I have no sympathy whatsoeverfor any player/coach/team executive complaining about "frigid" November weather. This is Canada! Suck it up and love it. You know where the door is otherwise.
Meanwhile…stands thin out when it gets cold. Just because you want to ignore the realities of the economics for the league, it does not mean the league is going to be that foolish.
meant other teams on a bi week, then crossover game at the team who has the most points. most likely western team. west vs east in a knockout game, the only game for the week. Grey Cup date is in stone.
I was thinking about revenue and the excitement it would bring
I think it’d be better to go back to the system whereby that scenario would be handled by having two west semis (1 vs 4, and 2 vs 3) and a two-game total points series between 1 and 2 in the east.
The problem with the fully integrated schedule is that it’s possible that all the teams from one division could finish with better records than all the teams from the other division. How would you set up the playoffs then?