Oh I"m not so sure I would call it whining (although I am sure I wouldn't call it whinning).
He had a point. If we aren't allowed to talk about one person's legal problems because it is before the courts, then why is it legitimate to discuss other person's legal problems that are also before the courts?
It's a valid question and I don't recall him ever being given an answer.
I have to agree with Arius and MadJack here... it seems that political correctness and censorship rule here.. wether we are not allowed to talk about someone's legal problems.. or a post gets deleted because of an arbitrary decision of what "is on topic" here... it seems to have gotten worse in the last year or so, but then again we can't see the salaries of CFL players.. yet just about every other league discloses salaries.. it seems the attitude here is what you don't know can't hurt you... :roll:
Ro, at the risk of stating the obvious, I think the whole point of Arius' one-man march is that NEITHER of the threads should have been locked/removed.
If we aren't allowed to talk about the legal problems facing a certain GM, then we shoudn't be discussing the legal problems of Armstead or Chris Bosch either. It's the double standard that was the problem I think.
My earlier complaint about the Armstead thread was intended purely as sarcasm. I never thought anyone would actually do something.... similar such sarcasm has not resulted in any other thread being deleted.
I was actually rather tame initially regarding this new version, if you check my initial response. But once Sportscallion "apologized" and asked for its removal, my more churlish self couldn't resist.....
Not sure I understand the reference to a "contractual agreement".