Which teams got the most in depth coverage … without having seen it, I’ll guess Argos, RRs and BBs.
I didn’t watch the whole thing cover to cover. I mostly skimmed the other segments, though I watched most of the Calgary and Hamilton parts out of interest. They seemed to spend a LOT of time on Calgary, Edmonton, and Toronto. (And by the way, there are no time stamps in the podcast at all so you can’t even easily flip to where your team discussion begins. Not a pro job at all.)
I will say that the podcast clocked in at 1:14 roughly, they didn’t get to the Als until the one-hour mark, and they still had time after our segment to do some dumb 3DN promo.
I don’t know why you guys torture yourselves
I was honestly curious about what their podcasts are like. I hadn’t watched one before. Not going to again, for sure.
These two guys are not cut out for podcasting = Low Energy…
Like watching paint dry.
This is the issue with a lot of online content these days. Anyone can throw up a “podcast.” Not everyone can do it well. Don’t show me two guys’ faces for over an hour if they aren’t animated. Audio only. Don’t show me an hour of content, period! Edit the dead space down.
The two of them have no rapport, no emotion.
These two and 3DN both forget that podcasts are supposed to be DEEP dives. You get into the weeds on a topic for an audience who isn’t casual. Know your audience, right? Which casual fan is watching your podcast? None of 'em. So when you record, don’t waste your audience’s time with generic stuff, high-level observations, recaps of obvious team storylines, because your audience already knows all of that.
Hervey being Hervey. Pluck a guy off the PR in the offseason, then cut him days before training camp. Keep it classy, Ed.
Are we interested in getting Roane back?
That is raw…
Est-ce qu’il est supérieur aux joueurs N sur l’alignement actuel des Alouettes?
Non
Richardson and Green oooooh the memory
Welcome back LeStaf
Deux (2) belles acquisitions de Jim Popp dg
Jamal Richardson 6´3 226 livres
SJ Green 6´3 216 livres
Chez les Alouettes, il y a un receveur qui s’améliore à chaque année:
2022 1 partie 6/7 (85,7%) 105 verges, moyenne 17,5, 1 touché
2023 12 parties 33/36 (91,6%) 389 verges, moyenne 11,8, 1 touché
2024 18 parties 58/85 (68,2%) 823 verges, moyenne 14,2, 7 touchés.
Je ne dis pas qu’il a le talent des deux (2) receveurs précités, mais comme eux, il est un receveur fiable et ceci dans toutes les occasions, il,s’agit de Cole Speiker 6´1 215 et sa progression depuis 3 ans est importante non seulement au niveau du temps de jeu mais également des passes captées et des touchés.
At his peak, Richardson was unstoppable. Big body who got great separation on his routes and had the hands to haul down pretty much anything AC threw his way.
Jouer pour que ça ne s’arrête jamais - La Presse+
Un dossier du 10/05 de Nicholas Richard dans la Presse +, avec et sur Davis Alexander le qa numéro 1 des Alouettes, la saison 2025 débute.
J’ai mieux connu « notre « qa, donc il pourquoi, il a changé de numéro de 3 à 10, en souvenir de son père.
Go Als et excellente saison 2025 Davis Alexander
Super intéressant cet article. Merci pour le partage.
Tout un compétiteur cet Alexander. Un vrai. Et un gars d’équipe à part ça. Le complément nécessaire pour être un vrai leader sur le terrain.
I liked him the very first time I saw him in pre-season. His big arm and confidence was obvious. There will be ups and downs in his first one or two seasons as a starter. I hope the team and fans support him through that mandatory growth period for a Starting quarterback.
Philpot saying he still hasn’t fully recovered from his injury. Says he’s at about 90%.
Merci du partage, j’ai hâte de voir quel sera le choix des entraîneurs comme receveur N sur l’équipe 1 en attendant que T. Philpot reçoive le ok des médecins pour pratiquer.
S. Fervius devrait être le choix des entraîneurs.
Hope they wait until he is the proverbial 110%
Des changements de numéro pour 2025:
Lorenzo Burns 43 pour 20
Geoffrey Cantin-Arku 19 pour 9
Bryce Cosby 30 pour 23
Josee Maltos 72 pour 19
Stevie Scott 111 35 pour 8