Yup , a first time for everything for sure . It's hard to believe , especially in a league with only nine (and at times only eight) teams that this is the first time in CFL history that the combination of BC , Ham and Mtl have all missed the play-offs in the same season . One has to wonder what the odds of this only happening once in all this time would be ? Crazy when you think about it . :o
LOL !!! It's all in my head , so basically from memory . I'm I guess what you would basically call a CFL history junkie . You can research and look it up if you like but trust me it's never happened before .
Johnny also thinks it is amazing that the Alouettes and Riders, met in the Grey Cup game for the first time ever in 2009. Before that, it had never happened.
Okay fair enough , but hows about we take Montreal out of the equation and just strictly look at the Cats and Lions then dating back to the Lions inaugural season in 1954 . So eliminating the cross-over years completely and just going East and West top 3 in each making the play-offs regardless of W/L records this will only be the 3rd time in history that both the Lions and Cats have failed to qualify in the same season(1960,1990,2017) . So when you look at it , it basically translates to only 3 times for these two teams missing together dating back to the 1954 season . Yup , so 3 times in a 63 year span , now that's kinda crazy when you think about it . :o
Of course winning a Stanley Cup with just 6 teams back in the day doesn't mean as much for such a team as winning a SC nowadays. Tell that to those teams that won when that was the case. Hey, the smaller the league, the better the talent really.
Who has won the most Stanley Cups in history? That is a number, a number any way to want to look at it.
And neither have the Atlantic Schooners every made the playoffs.
That sort of statistical analysis is what I believe Mark Twain was referring to when he popularized the phrase "Lies, damned lies, and statistics". Of course, what he was referring to was the use of "numbers" to bolster weak arguments when the numbers were either irrelevant, inapplicableor inappropriate for the argument being made. Sorta like stating how few gun deaths occurred prior to the invention of the firearm.