disciplineandpunish wrote:It boggles my mind that Trestman, who has an extensive NFL background, is so reluctant to run the ball. I'm not familiar with his work in Oakland during the Gannon-Rice era -- was it purely West Coast?
That is actually a pretty good question by DP... I didn't pay enough attention to the raiders offense at the time, but just researched the stats out of curiosity.
Mark Trestman was offensive coordinator for the raiders in 2002 and 2003. His best year was 2002 where the Raiders had one of the best offenses in the league and went to the Superbowl. QB Rich Gannon was league MVP. Some stats below (the similarity with Als stats is amazing).
- Team 1st for passing yards
- Team 2nd for points scored
- Team 2nd for pass attempts
- Team tied for 2nd for least interceptions
- Team 2nd for team QB rating
- Team 23rd for rush attempts
- Jerry Rice was 9th in the league for receptions ...followed by RB Charlie Garner 10th and WR Tim Brown 16th
- RB Charlie Garner 962 yards rushing and 941 yards receiving
There has been many comments regarding the play selection of the Als this year, not only on this forum but also by the local press. Although, many of these comments are valid, I think it is important to say that Mark Trestman has been consistent at sticking to a philosophy which has served him well (and many other succesful coaches, including Bill Walsh) in the past years. For the only sake of demonstrating my point, here are some of the basic principles of the west coast offense :
- As opposed to more conventional offenses preceding the west coast offense which used to run first to eventually setup the pass, the west coast offense philosophy was to pass first in order to setup the run
- Based on the principle above, west coast offense coaches would go for short passes on first down in order to achieve the same result as other run-minded coaches who would run the ball on first down to attempt getting 4-5 yards. West Coast offense coaches are often of the opinion that is easier to pass the ball for five yards then to run it for the same gain, basically it's a different means to achieve the same result.
- As opposed to most offenses of the time which ran the ball early and focused on passing when behind in the score, the philosophy of the west coast offense was to pass the ball early to get the lead and then rundown the clock with the running game.
- As opposed to the other revolutionary pass offense of the 80s, the Air-Coryell type offense, which spread the field vertically with a couple deep threats on every play, the west coast offense philosophy was aimed at spreading the field horizontally with short routes in the intermediate zones.
- In order to make the short routes most successful, the short routes were designed to be precisely timed with the dropback steps of the QB...after the QB takes his last step, he winds up, throws the ball, the receiver then makes his cut and the ball is right there for him.
Some of the proven benefits of the west coast offense just happen to be well suited for Als personnel, as
- It is better suited for QBs with average arm strength but high accuracy, as it focuses on short passes.
- It is better suited for experienced receiver which may be past their prime as far as speed, but run accurate patterns, read well the defense and adjust patterns accordingly, and also have good hands
- It is better suited for less dominating offensive lines, as the ball is released quickly which lessens the time that the line needs to maintain the pass protection pocket
- It is well suited for teams with much depth at wide receiver positions and running backs with good receiving skills as many receivers get the ball as part of the philosophy to force the defense to defend the entire width of the field
Based on the above, although I see the validity of comments expressed by many fans and the press with regards to the play selection, I feel that the system we currently use has proven itself has sound and many teams, including the Als, have won championships with these.